Resolution Trust Corp. v. Fleischer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding accrued tort claim to be vested property right and rejecting similar final-judgment argument because it \fails to recognize the distinction between a right of action and a right of recovery\
• holding accrued tort claim to be vested property right and rejecting similar final-judgment argument because it “fails to recognize the distinction between a right of action and a right of recovery”
• holding accrued tort claim to be vested property right and rejecting similar final-judgment argument because it “fails to recognize the distinction between a right of action and a right of recovery”
• indicating an exception to this rule for changes in. substantive law, whereas the present case involves procedural changes
• nature of the rights at stake, how the rights were affected, and the nature and strength of the public interest furthered by the legislation
• Retroactive application of a statute impairing a tort cause of action was held to violate both the state constitution’s provision similar to Article 19 as well as the state constitution’s due process clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).