Supreme Court of Kansas· 9/17/2010
Becker Ex Rel. Becker v. Knoll
Citations
- 239 P.3d 830
- 291 Kan. 204
- 31 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 451
- 2010 Kan. LEXIS 625
- 2010 WL 3604546
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- prima facie evidence is evidence sufficient to sustain a verdict in favor of the issue it supports, even though it may be contradicted by other evidence
- \The Court of Appeals should have applied a de novo standard to review whether the district court properly applied the law—the shifted burden of proof—to the facts.\
- Director of a corporation owes high fiduciary duty to the stockholders of the corporation.
- Director of a corporation owes high fiduciary duty to the stockholders of the corporation.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rosen, Davis, Powers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Caranchini v. PeckD. Kansas· 2018-11-26· cited 14×
- In re Marriage of BahlmannCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2019-04-05· cited 8×
- In Re QuVIS, Inc.D. Kansas· 2011-02-18· cited 6×
- Becker v. KnollSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-01-30· cited 5×
- Brooks v. HornerAlaska Supreme Court· 2015-03-13· cited 5×
- Jenkins v. IBD, Inc.D. Kansas· 2013-04-11· cited 5×
- City of Wichita v. TrotterCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2021-07-16· cited 4×
- HCI Investors, LLC v. FoxMissouri Court of Appeals· 2013-10-08· cited 4×
- Murray v. Miracorp, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas· 2024-04-05· cited 3×
- Friesen v. Seacoast Capital Partners II, L.P. (In re QuVis, Inc.)D. Kansas· 2011-02-18· cited 1×
- Brinker v. McCaslinCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2023-10-20· cited 1×
- Bicknell v. Kansas Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas· 2022-05-20
- Neuman v. Anesthesia Assocs. of Kansas CityCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2025-08-01
- Williams v. GreensteinCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2025-10-17
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware· 1984-03-01· cited 1,206×
- Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1993-12-23· cited 768×
- Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1983-02-01· cited 690×
- Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1994-01-18· cited 456×
- In Re Walt Disney Co. Derivative LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware· 2006-06-08· cited 339×
- McCall v. ScottSixth Circuit· 2001-02-13· cited 161×
- Newton v. Hornblower, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1978-07-21· cited 87×
- Burcham v. Unison Bancorp, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas· 2003-09-26· cited 85×
- Owen Lumber Co. v. ChartrandSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-05-04· cited 82×
- VFB LLC v. Campbell Soup Co.Third Circuit· 2007-03-30· cited 80×
- In Re Merck & Co. Securities & ERISA LitigationThird Circuit· 2007-07-18· cited 72×
- Cadle Co. v. D'AddarioSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-04-13· cited 70×
- In The Matter Of Lawrence B. SeidmanThird Circuit· 1994-09-14· cited 66×
- Miller v. Foulston, Siefkin, Powers & EberhardtSupreme Court of Kansas· 1990-04-13· cited 58×
- Cookies Food Products, Inc. v. Lakes Warehouse Distributing, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1988-10-19· cited 49×
- Richards v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1994-08-12· cited 45×
- Frick Farm Properties, L.P. v. State, Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of Kansas· 2009-09-25· cited 40×
- Brundage v. New Jersey Zinc Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1967-01-23· cited 31×
- Hesston Corp. v. KaysSupreme Court of Kansas· 1994-03-11· cited 28×
- Green Party v. Hartz Mountain Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2000-06-13· cited 28×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.