Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 10/13/1993
Johnson v. State
Citations
- 871 S.W.2d 183
- 1993 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 157
- 1993 WL 404641
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that in circumstantial evidence cases, “it is not necessary that every fact point directly and independently to the defendant’s guilt; it is enough if the conclusion is warranted by the combined and cumulative force of all the incriminating circumstances”
- holding that in circumstantial evidence cases, ―it is not necessary that every fact point directly and independently to the defendant‘s guilt; it is enough if the conclusion is warranted by the combined and cumulative force of all the incriminating circumstances‖
- holding that, in a circumstantial evidence case, “it is not necessary that every fact point directly and independently to the defendant’s guilt; it is enough if the conclusion is warranted by the combined and cumulative force of all the incriminating circumstances”
- holding that, in a circumstantial evidence case, “it is not necessary that every fact point directly and independently to the defendant’s guilt; it is enough if the conclusion is warranted by the combined and cumulative force of all the incriminating circumstances”
- holding that, in a circumstantial evidence case, A it is not necessary that every fact point directly and independently to the defendant = s guilt; it is enough if the conclusion is warranted by the combined and cumulative force of all the incriminating circumstances @
- addressing circumstantial evidence that gun cleaning kits for a .25 caliber firearm and a .38 caliber firearm were found in the accused’s home, even though the actual firearms, themselves, were not found in the accused’s home
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: White, Clinton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
797 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-01-31· cited 5,494×
- Winfrey, Megan AKA Megan Winfrey HammondCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-02-27· cited 784×
- Hartsfield v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2010-03-09· cited 543×
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-03-27· cited 418×
- Couchman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1999-09-09· cited 411×
- Powell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-04-12· cited 358×
- Escobedo v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1999-05-19· cited 348×
- Roberson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2000-04-13· cited 277×
- Acosta, Victor ManuelCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2014-05-07· cited 236×
- Willis v. StateTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2006-05-10· cited 149×
- Allen v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2008-03-25· cited 148×
- Barnes v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2001-11-29· cited 126×
- Howley v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1997-03-27· cited 116×
- Coleman v. StateTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2006-04-05· cited 102×
- Nguyen v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2001-07-31· cited 101×
- Russo v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-06-07· cited 95×
- Camarillo v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2002-05-09· cited 90×
- Madden v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1996-01-24· cited 86×
- Turro v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1997-07-03· cited 83×
- Barnum v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2000-01-20· cited 81×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.