Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining the interest of citizens in “keep[ing] a watchful eye on the 14 workings of public agencies”
• explaining the interest of 5 citizens in “keep[ing] a watchful eye on the workings of public agencies”
• explaining the interest of 9 citizens in “keep[ing] a watchful eye on the workings of public agencies”
• proper to seal 6 “sources of business information that might harm a litigant’s competitive standing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).