Baxter International, Incorporated v. Abbott Laboratories

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that notwithstanding prior confidentiality agreements, \any claim of secrecy must be reviewed independently in [the appellate] court\
• stating that only trade secrets, information covered by a recognized privilege, and information required by statute to be maintained in confidence may be filed under seal
• requiring that the parties requesting to seal parts of the appellate record provide more than “asserti[ons] that the document must be kept confidential because we say so”
• noting that, “[i]n civil litigation, only trade secrets, information covered by a recognized privilege (such as the attorney-client privilege), and information required by statute to be maintained in confidence (such as the name of a minor victim of a sexual assault
• noting “[t]he. strong presumption of public disclosure” for “materials that formed the basis of the parties’ dispute and- the district court’s resolution”
• noting that, “[i]n civil litigation, only trade secrets, information covered by a recognized privilege (such as the attorney-client privilege), and information required by statute to be maintained in confidence (such as the name of a minor victim of a sexual assault

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).