In Re the Knight Publishing Company D/B/A the Charlotte Observer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that \[t]he court's findings must be specific enough to enable a reviewing court to determine whether the closure order was proper\
• explaining that “whether the public has already had access to the information contained in the records” constitutes one factor under common-law analysis
• noting that even when there is basis to protect records from disclosure, courts must still consider whether there are “alternatives to sealing the documents”
• explaining that \[t]he court's findings must be specific enough to enable a reviewing court to determine whether the closure order was proper\
• explaining that “whether the public has already had access to the information contained in the records” constitutes one factor under common-law analysis
• explaining that “whether the public has already had access to the information contained in the records” constitutes one factor under common-law analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).