Skip to main content
· 6/18/2003

Federal Case

Citations

  • 331 F.3d 1122

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Phillips exception is “expressly limited to the status of materials ... attached to a non-dispositive motion”
  • holding that the Phillips exception is \expressly limited to the status of materials ... attached to a non-dispositive motion\
  • holding that the Phillips exception is “expressly limited to the status of materials ... attached to a non-dispositive motion”
  • holding that the Phillips exception is \expressly limited to the status of materials ... attached to a non-dispositive motion\
  • holding that the Phillips exception is “expressly limited to the status of materials ... attached to a non-dispositive motion” (emphasis omitted)
  • holding that the Phillips exception is “expressly limited to the status of materials . . . attached to a non-dispositive motion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.