Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 10/12/1973

Nixon v. Sirica

Citations

  • 159 U.S. App. D.C. 58
  • 487 F.2d 700
  • 19 A.L.R. Fed. 343

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Holding that applicability of executive privilege is for the courts, not the executive itself, to define
  • concluding that an order compelling President Nixon to produce documents requested by a subpoena for in camera examination “is not a form of criminal process”
  • concluding that President Nixon’s statement that “[e]xecutive privilege will not be invoked” did not constitute a waiver of the executive privilege
  • \[C]ourts should normally direct legal process to a lower Executive official even though the effect of the process is to restrain or compel the President.\
  • grand jury’s need for information in criminal case outweighed president’s interest in confidentiality
  • applicability of executive privilege is ultimately for courts, not the executive, to decide

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bazelon, Leventhal, MacKinnon, McGowan, Robinson, Wilkey, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

149 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

104 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.