United States v. Amodeo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “[u]nlimited access to every item turned up in the course of litigation would be unthinkable”
• holding that law enforcement interests should be considered in determining whether public access to judicial documents should be granted
• recognizing that “the privacy interests of innocent third parties should weigh heavily in a court’s VENABLE □□ balancing equation” for consideration of a protective order
• holding that law enforcement interests should be considered in determining whether public access to judicial documents should be granted
• holding that law enforcement interests should be considered in determining whether public access to judicial documents should be granted
• holding that a district court’s grant of a motion to seal a filing bearing little weight on the court’s Article III functions was proper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).