Supreme Court· 10/11/1965

Zemel v. Rusk

Citations

381 U.S. 1
85 S. Ct. 1271
14 L. Ed. 2d 179
1965 U.S. LEXIS 1304

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

reasoning that the fact that Congress “left completely untouched” language from an earlier statute was some evidence that the administrative interpretation of the language was the one Congress intended
noting that statutes affecting, foreign relations often “leave the exercise of power to - [the President’s] unrestricted judgment,” but that does not mean that the President has “totally unrestricted freedom of choice”
sustaining Government refusal to validate passports to Cuba even though that restriction \rendered less than wholly free the flow of information concerning that country\
sustaining Government refusal to validate passports to Cuba even though that restriction “rendered less than wholly free the flow of information concerning that country”
rejecting appellant’s contention that “a First Amendment right ... is involved” in government’s denial of right to travel to Cuba
rejecting appellant's contention that \a First Amendment right ... is involved\ in government's denial of right to travel to Cuba

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warren, Black, Douglas, Goldberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

614 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Zemel v. Rusk

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.