Seventh Circuit· 6/3/2011

Narvaez v. United States

Citations

674 F.3d 621
2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 24438
2011 WL 6382106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“The misapplication of the career- offender status—which increased Mr. Narvaez’s sentencing range—is certainly a substantive error.”
“the career offender status illegally increased Mr. Narvaez’s sentence approximately five years beyond that authorized by the [then-mandatory] sentencing scheme,” but below the statutory maximum
“the career offender status illegally increased Mr. Narvaez’s sentence approximately five years beyond that authorized by the [then-mandatory] sentencing scheme,” but below the statutory maximum

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kanne, Ripple, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Narvaez v. United States

12 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.