Skip to main content
· 8/24/1994

Reed v. Farley

Citations

  • 512 U.S. 339
  • 114 S. Ct. 2291
  • 129 L. Ed. 2d 277
  • 1994 U.S. LEXIS 4643

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that \`congressional consent transforms an interstate compact ... into a law of the United States'\ (quoting Cuyler v. Adams, 449 U.S. at 438, 101 S.Ct. 703)
  • holding that “a state court’s failure to observe the 120-day rule of IAD Article IV(c
  • holding that “[a] showing of prejudice is required to establish a violation of the Sixth Amendment Speedy Trial Clause” under Barker, 407 U.S. at 530
  • holding that a state court's commencement of a defendant's trial 54 days after the expiration of the 180-day period provided in the IADA did not violate the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial
  • requiring that cause for, and prejudice resulting from, a procedurally defaulted claim be demonstrated before the merits of the claim may be addressed
  • noting that the Court has repeatedly declined to extend the rule in Stone beyond its original bounds; deciding Interstate Agreement on Detainer Act speedy trial claim on state grounds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Thomas, Blackmun, Stevens, Kennedy, Souter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.