Skip to main content
· 7/1/2013

Thomas Vitrano v. United States

Citations

  • 721 F.3d 802
  • 2013 WL 3326834
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 13375

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Supreme Court recognized the general right not to be subject to an enhanced sentence based on an understanding of the term “violent felony” that conflicted with Begay v. United States, 553 U.S. 137, 148 (2008
  • holding that the Supreme Court recognized the general right not to be subject to an enhanced sentence based on an understanding of the term “violent felony” that conflicted with Begay v. United States, 553 U.S. 137, 148 (2008
  • holding that the Supreme Court recognized the general right not to be subject to an enhanced sentence based on an understanding of the term “violent felony” that conflicted with Begay v. United States, 553 U.S. 137, 148 (2008
  • holding that the Supreme Court recognized the general right not to be subject to an enhanced sentence based on an understanding of the term \violent felony\ that conflicted with Begay v. United States, 553 U.S. 137 , 148, 128 S.Ct. 1581 , 170 L.Ed.2d 490 (2008

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Manion, Kanne, Tinder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.