Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 6/19/1997

O'Dell v. Netherland

Citations

  • 521 U.S. 151
  • 117 S. Ct. 1969
  • 138 L. Ed. 2d 351
  • 1997 U.S. LEXIS 3862

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Simmons rule does not constitute an exception to the ordinary non-retroactivity of new constitutional rules under Teague
  • holding that Simmons announced a new rule of law for which habeas corpus relief is not available retroactively
  • holding that Simmons announced a new rule of law for which habeas corpus relief is not available retroactively
  • holding that Simmons announced a new rule and retrospective application of the rule was barred by Teague
  • holding that Simmons announced a new rule and retrospective application of the rule was barred by Teague
  • holding that Simmons announced a new rule and retrospective application of the rule was barred by Teague

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas, Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

341 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named O'Dell v. Netherland

7 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.