Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 4/26/2000

Slack v. McDaniel

Citations

  • 529 U.S. 473
  • 120 S. Ct. 1595
  • 146 L. Ed. 2d 542
  • 2000 U.S. LEXIS 3000
  • 13 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 257

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that, if the district court refused relief on procedural grounds, a COA should issue upon the applicant’s showing “that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether” (1
  • stating that a petition filed after a dismissal under Rose is to be treated as any other first petition
  • considering whether to grant a certificate of appealability after the district court declined to issue one
  • considering whether to grant a certificate of appealability after the district court declined to issue one
  • declining to issue a COA after district court dismissed habeas petition under Rule 41
  • COA needed for claims decided on the merits and for claims dismissed on procedural grounds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy, Rehnquist, O'Con-Nor, Scaua, Thomas, Ginsburg, Stevens, O'Connor, Souter, Breyer, Scalia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

At least 1,864 cases in this archive cite this case. Too many to rank, so this is a sample of 20 of them, not the most cited.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Slack v. McDaniel

8 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.