James Hanson v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the petitioner “failed to show that the Supreme Court in Mathis intended to create a new rule upon which the statute of limitations may run”
• holding Mathis does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review
• “An error that may have occurred in calculating the Guidelines range does not constitute a ‘miscarriage of justice’ when the ‘sentence is well below the ceiling imposed by Congress.’ [Citation].”
• affirming the holdings in Hawkins and Coleman

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Nino Franklin v. Randy Keyes
  Seventh Circuit· 2022-04-04· cited 13×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mathis v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2016-06-23· cited 2,769×
• Byron Blake v. United States
  Seventh Circuit· 2013-07-25· cited 374×
• Todd R. Chazen v. Matthew Marske
  Seventh Circuit· 2019-09-09· cited 152×
• United States v. Quadale Coleman
  Seventh Circuit· 2014-08-14· cited 144×
• Bernard Hawkins v. United States
  Seventh Circuit· 2013-02-07· cited 140×
• Welch v. United States
  Seventh Circuit· 2010-05-04· cited 109×
• Narvaez v. United States
  Seventh Circuit· 2011-06-03· cited 108×
• Hrobowski v. United States
  Seventh Circuit· 2018-09-17· cited 12×

Other cases named James Hanson v. United States

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• James Hanson v. United States
  Seventh Circuit· 2019-10-22
• James Hanson v. United States
  Seventh Circuit· 2019-10-22