Skip to main content
· 9/26/1994

Narey v. Dean

Citations

  • 32 F.3d 1521
  • 9 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1709
  • 30 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 760
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 26830

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that federal courts have jurisdiction to entertain challenges to unreviewed state administrative agency decisions
  • holding that the court will not consider an issue not raised in the district court unless (1) it involves a pure question of law and refusal to consider it would result in a miscarriage of justice; (2
  • indicating that res judicata is not a jurisdictional issue
  • “[U]nder [Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure] 4(a)(4

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.