Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Eleventh Circuit· 9/8/1997

Lucero v. Trosch

Citations

  • 121 F.3d 591
  • 38 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 820
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 23591
  • 1997 WL 525439

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing a “significant” government interest in “promoting the free flow of traffic on public streets”
  • indicating that the case or controversy standard provides supplemental jurisdiction over state claims that arise out of a common nucleus of operative fact with a substantial federal claim
  • explaining that 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a) “confers supplemental jurisdiction over all claims which arise out of a common nucleus of operative fact with a substantial federal claim”
  • striking down 200-foot residential buffer zone; stating that \the Court's discussion [in Madsen] makes clear that its precedents support restriction of targeted picketing rather than a generalized restriction\
  • striking down 200-foot residential buffer zone; stating that \the Court's discussion [in Madsen] makes clear that its precedents support restriction of targeted picketing rather than a generalized restriction\
  • “[W]e will defer to the district court’s ‘reasonable assessment’ of the number of feet necessary to ensure that access to the [c]linic is not impeded.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Probst, Anderson, Cox, Roney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Lucero v. Trosch

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.