Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. Joseph Mosseri

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that plaintiff’s trademark claims arose out of defendant’s contacts with forum state because defendant sold and distributed allegedly infringing ■ goods in forum state
• recognizing that the Calder “effects test” applies to intentional tort cases and outlining the three elements
• holding that trademark infringement occurring in Florida satisfied the “tortious activity” provision of the Florida long-arm statute
• concluding that an accessible website and evidence of sales of infringing goods into Florida is sufficient to constitute a tortious act in Florida
• holding due process satisfied where a defendant advertised, sold, and distributed trademark-infringing goods to Floridians from New York
• holding that arguments not raised below are waived for appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).