Skip to main content
· 8/4/1995

Hargett v. Valley Federal Savings Bank

Citations

  • 60 F.3d 754
  • 32 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1349
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 20624
  • 66 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,661
  • 68 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 852

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that lay-off started running of Title VII limitations period, despite subsequent alleged discriminatory act
  • concluding that a retal- iation claim raised for the first time in an amended complaint did not relate back to an age discrimination claim in the original com- plaint because the discrimination claim was “not timely filed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carnes, Johnson, Hobbs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.