Skip to main content
· 7/25/1995

Beckwith v. City of Daytona Beach Shores

Citations

  • 58 F.3d 1554
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19477
  • 1995 WL 405739

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an employee’s burden of showing that her speech was a “substantial” or “motivating” factor in the decision to terminate her “is not a heavy one”
  • observing that the “[a]ppellees’ failure to brief this issue abandons it for the purposes of this appeal”
  • reversing trial court‘s JNOV on a fire chief‘s First Amendment retaliation claim because the chief‘s speech at city council meetings was protected under the First Amendment
  • noting, in dicta, basic fire and rescue services are matters of public concern
  • “Few subjects are of more public concern to the average citizen than the provision of basic fire and rescue services.”
  • “It is neither possible nor desirable to fashion a single standard for determining when an employee has met her initial burden of demonstrating that a retaliatory intent was a ‘substantial’ or ‘motivating factor’ behind a government employment decision.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dubina, Black, Cohill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.