Access Now, Inc. v. Southwest Airlines Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, if an appellant does not present a legal claim or argument in his initial brief, that argument is deemed abandoned
• holding that issues or arguments not raised in the district court and raised for the first time on appeal will not be considered
• holding that a “legal claim or argument that has not been briefed before the court is deemed abandoned and its merits will not be addressed”
• holding that we do not consider issues an appellant failed to raise before the district court
• holding that “a legal claim or argument that has not been briefed before the court is deemed abandoned and its merits will not be addressed”
• holding that “a legal claim or argument that has not been briefed before th[is C]ourt is deemed abandoned and its merits will not be addressed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).