Gash Associates v. Village of Rosemont, Illinois

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court erred by dismissing the case on the basis of res judicata because Rooker-Feldman applied and thus deprived the court of jurisdiction
• explaining that \[e]quating the Rooker-Feldman doctrine with preclusion is natural ... [b]ut the two are not coextensive\
• stating that while equating Rooker-Feldman doctrine with preclusion is understandable, the two concepts are distinct
• explaining that “[e]quating the Rooker-Feldman doctrine with preclusion is natural . . . [b]ut the two are not coextensive”
• explaining that “[ejquating the Rooker-Feldman doctrine with preclusion is natural ... [b]ut the two are not coextensive”
• finding that plaintiff “objects to the outcome of a judicial proceeding and filed a separate suit to get around it,” and therefore Rooker-Feldman precluded plaintiffs federal suit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).