Skip to main content

Myers v. State

Citations

  • 573 S.W.2d 19
  • 1978 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1388

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that prosecutor’s argument that there has been no explanation for why a person would possess so much marijuana was an impermissible critique on the defendants’ failure to testify
  • holding that State's argument that there had been no explanation why a man would have 269 pounds of marijuana was comment on defendant's failure to testify because defendant was only one who could offer explanation
  • holding prosecutor’s argument that only defendant or his codefendant knew defendant’s possible motive for possessing 269 pounds of marijuana was improper comment on defendant’s failure to testify
  • holding prosecutor = s argument that only defendant or his codefendant knew defendant = s possible motive for possessing 269 pounds of marijuana was improper comment on defendant = s failure to testify
  • prosecutor made an improper closing argument when a comment about an accurate statement of fact created an implied or indirect allusion to the defendant’s failure to testify
  • prosecutor made an improper closing argument when a comment about an accurate statement of fact created an implied or indirect allusion to the defendant’s failure to testify

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Douglas, Davis, Vol-Lers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.