Skip to main content

Owen v. State

Citations

  • 656 S.W.2d 458
  • 1983 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1051

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that conviction must be reversed if prosecutor’s remark called jury’s attention to absence of evidence that only defendant’s testimony could supply
  • defendant testified at trial but not sentencing hearing; prosecutor’s remarks about defendant’s failure to say he was sorry constituted reversible error
  • harm from comment on defendant's failure to testify is so egregious it cannot be cured by instruction to disregard
  • “If the remark complained of called the jury’s attention to the absence of evidence that only the testimony from the appellant could supply, the conviction must be reversed.”
  • “The prohibition against a comment on the defendant’s failure to testify is mandatory and the adverse effect [of such a comment] is not generally cured by an instruction to the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tom G. Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.