Skip to main content

Joel Navarro v. State

Citations

  • 469 S.W.3d 687
  • 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 6903
  • 2015 WL 4103565

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that reviewing court is to consider even improperly admitted evidence in determining sufficiency of the evidence
  • explaining that, although generally, a charge tracking statutory language is not error, “the jury must understand which law to apply, and the wording of a statute may not be enough . . . . if the statutory text on which it is based has a variable meaning in the eyes of the jury”
  • majority op. and op. of Frost, C.J., dissenting

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frost, Christopher, Busby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Joel Navarro v. State

10 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.