Skip to main content

Murphy v. Smith

Citations

  • 579 N.E.2d 165
  • 411 Mass. 133

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing applicability of continuing representation doctrine “where the attorney in question continues to represent the plaintiffs interests in the matter in question”
  • cause of action governed by discovery rule but continuous representation rule tolls the statute of limitations until attorney’s termination
  • plaintiffs unaware of attorney’s purportedly improper certification of good record title until receipt of letter from neighbor’s attorney
  • the continuing representation doctrine “tolls the statute of limitations in legal malpractice actions where the attorney in question continues to represent the plaintiffs interests in the matter in question”
  • neighbor's letter that asserted conflicting legal right to property was sufficient notice of attorney's potential negligence in certifying good record title
  • statute of limitations in legal malpractice cases tolled where attorney in question continues to represent the clients’ interests in the matter in question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Liacos, Wilkins, Abrams, O'Connor, Greaney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.