Wheatley v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, in age discrimination case, six-month period did not run until terminated plaintiff became aware that his duties were transferred to younger employees
• stating that it is the practice of the Massachusetts courts “to apply Federal case law construing the Federal anti-discrimination statutes in interpreting G.L. c. 151B”
• holding discrimination cause of action arose when plaintiff received notice of the adverse action, not when he learned of the improper motive underlying it
• applying federal case law to construing the federal anti-discrimination statutes to interpret ch. 151B claims
• finding facts in Ricks inapposite, but holding that date of unequivocal notice marks accrual
• finding facts in Ricks inapposite, but holding that date of unequivocal notice marks accrual

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).