International Strategies Group, Ltd. v. Greenberg Traurig, LLP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff did not have an implied attorney-client relationship where there was no evidence that plaintiff explicitly requested legal advice
• recognizing that the continuous representation doctrine was inapplicable to toll the statute of limitations because there was no attorney-client relationship
• recognizing, under Massachusetts law, aiding and abetting tort claims have a three-year statute of limitations
• applying Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 260, § 2A to claims of conversion and breach of fiduciary duty
• “We review a district court’s denial of a motion for reconsideration or relief from judgment for abuse of discretion”
• “A company’s actual subsequent performance is something to 5 consider when determining ex post the reasonableness of a valuation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).