Skip to main content
· 9/28/2011

Morson v. Kreindler & Kreindler, LLP

Citations

  • 814 F. Supp. 2d 220
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112310
  • 2011 WL 4526077

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • staying an action because the ongoing parallel litigation in Canada would be “instructive on the ultimate resolution” of the stayed action
  • favoring stay because “agreement is the font from which all the disputes flow”
  • “[T]he interests of judicial economy will be best served by a stay, which will allow the Albertan court to address the meaning of the Exclusivity Agreement under Alberta law without duplication of effort by this Court and without the need for expert testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hurley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.