Bowen v. Eli Lilly & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a cause of action accrues when the plaintiff has notice of the basic fact that he has been harmed by the defendant's conduct, regardless of an ignorance of the particulars
• holding that a cause of action accrues when the plaintiff has notice of the basic fact that he has been harmed by the defendant's conduct, regardless of an ignorance of the particulars
• noting that the court should look at “a reasonable person in the position of the plaintiff’
• noting that the court should look at “a reasonable person in the position of the plaintiff’
• noting that the court should look at “a reasonable person in the position of the plaintiff’
• stating that “[r]easonable notice that a particular product or a particular act of another person may have been a cause of harm to a plaintiff creates a duty of inquiry”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).