Rosen Construction Ventures, Inc. v. Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky & Popeo, P.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that plaintiff had not suffered appreciable harm when it hired another attorney because law firm continued to provide repeated assurances that plaintiff would prevail and therefore plaintiff engaged another attorney for reasons unrelated to dissatisfaction with representation
• declining to hold that a claim accrued as a matter of law based on a note because \the language [the firm] cite[d] [wa]s ambiguous\ as to whether the plaintiff had actual knowledge of the firm's alleged negligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).