Cantu v. St. Paul Companies

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that “the innocence reliance which the continued representation doctrine seeks to protect” was not implicated because plaintiff “had questioned and had assessed [the attorney’s] representation of his interest and found it to be wanting”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).