Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 1/16/2019

Moss v. Princip

Citations

  • 913 F.3d 508

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the question of who should or may be joined in the action must be determined under Rule 19 and Rule 20 rather than Rule 17(a
  • “For the purposes of diversity jurisdiction, a partnership is a citizen of every state in which one of its partners or members is a citizen.”
  • “Diversity jurisdiction requires . . . complete diversity of parties.”
  • discussing Bankston v. Burch, 27 F.3d 164 (5th Cir. 1994)
  • “When a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence is not preserved for appellate review, ‘[w]e review . . . for plain error . . . .’” (quoting NewCSI, Inc. v. Staffing 360 Sols., Inc., 865 F.3d 251, 257 (5th Cir. 2017))
  • deploying the label sixteen times

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graves, Higginbotham, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.