Louisiana v. American National Property & Casualty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[e]very circuit that has addressed the question has held that” the Red Cab rule applies in the CAFA context
• stating that “post-removal events” will not trigger remand where “jurisdictional facts ... determined at the time of removal” established removal was proper
• describing \overwhelming and unanimous authority\ among the circuit courts for the position that post-removal events do not oust CAFA jurisdiction
• stating the “long-established general rule, holding that jurisdictional facts are determined at the time of removal, and consequently post-removal events do not affect that properly established jurisdiction”
• indicating non- certification would not defeat diversity jurisdiction in removal context
• “[Jjurisdictional facts are determined at the time of removal, and consequently post-removal events do not affect that properly established jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).