in Re Mark Fisher and Reece Boudreaux

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a consent to jurisdiction clause allows a court to avoid conducting any analysis regarding a party’s contacts with a forum
• citing, inter alia, RSR Corp. v. Siegmund, 309 S.W.3d 686, 704 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2010, no 14 pet.)
• finding a forum selection clause containing “agrees not to bring any proceeding ... in any other court” but “non-exclusive jurisdiction” to be mandatory
• finding a forum selection clause containing “agrees not to bring any proceeding . . . in any other court” but “non-exclusive jurisdiction” to be mandatory
• finding “no reason to deviate from the type of analysis” used in forum selection clause cases to determine applicability of Section 15.020 mandatory venue provision
• addressing the argument that section 15.020 was “inapplicable” because the underlying clause was permissive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).