Carden v. Arkoma Associates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, for the purpose of diversity jurisdiction, the citizenship of a limited partnership is determined by the citizen ship of each of the partners
• holding that a limited liability company organized in Connecticut is a citizen of Delaware, where its sole member resided
• stating that, for purposes of diversity jurisdiction, limited partnerships have the citizenship of each of its general and limited partners
• stating that, for purposes of diversity jurisdiction, limited partnerships have the citizenship of each of its general and limited partners
• stating that, for purposes of diversity jurisdiction, limited partnerships have the citizenship of all of its general and limited partners
• providing that diversity jurisdiction in a suit by or against an artificial entity depends on the citizenship of all its members

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Carden v. Arkoma Associates

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Carden v. Arkoma Associates
  Supreme Court· 1987-01-12
• Carden v. Arkoma Associates
  Supreme Court· 1989-02-21
• Carden v. Arkoma Associates
  Supreme Court· 1989-02-21
• Carden v. Arkoma Associates
  Supreme Court· 1989-05-01
• Carden v. Arkoma Associates
  Supreme Court· 1989-05-01