United States Ex Rel. Wallace v. Flintco Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding non-compliance with Rule 50(a) when moving party did not “alert” non-moving party to grounds for sufficiency of evidence challenge and “allow” non-moving party the “opportunity to move to cure any such deficiency”
• finding non-compliance with Rule 50(a) when moving party did not “alert” non-moving party to grounds for sufficiency of evidence challenge and “allow” non-moving party the “opportunity to move to cure any such deficiency”
• “[i]f any evidence supports the jury verdict, the verdict will be upheld.”
• “A party that fails to move for judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50(a) on the basis of insufficient evidence at the conclusion of all of the evidence waives its right to file a renewed post-verdict Rule 50(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).