Carol H. Pulitzer-Polster v. Samuel C. Pulitzer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that negative result in the federal suit may harm the absent parties’ efforts in the state suit
• noting that “a district court’s decision to dismiss for failure to join an indispensable party is properly reviewed under an abuse-of-discretion standard”
• explaining that “Rule 19’s emphasis on a careful examination of the facts means that a district court will ordinarily be in a better position to make a Rule 19 decision than a circuit court would be.”
• “[W]e must assess the factors set out in Rule 19(b), seeking to avoid manifest injustice while taking full cognizance of the practicalities involved.”
• “Rule 19 seeks to bring into a lawsuit all those persons who ought to be there by requiring joinder.”
• “Rule 19 seeks to bring into a lawsuit all those persons who ought to be there by requiring joinder.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).