Skip to main content

Montoya v. State

Citations

  • 810 S.W.2d 160
  • 1989 WL 54049

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the “[l]ength of time that the jury may be held for deliberation rests in the discretion of the trial judge”
  • explaining that a juror’s trouble understanding English was an ex-cludable ground under art. 35.16(a)(ll)
  • rejecting murder defendant’s complaint that parties charge under section 7.02(b) accompanied by definition of conspiracy using language found in section 15.02 added unindicted offense of criminal conspiracy to the charge
  • applying Article 35.16(a)(11) to a prospective juror who expressed difficulty understanding spoken English
  • challenge for cause properly overruled where juror stated he could consider whether an officer lied or made a mistake
  • no reversible error where venireperson excused because he needed the assistance of interpreter and testified he had limited understanding of English and became confused when the prosecutor attempted to explain the procedures

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCORMICK

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

198 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.