Skip to main content

Munoz v. State

Citations

  • 24 S.W.3d 427
  • 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 3598
  • 2000 WL 702394

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant must prove deficiency by a preponderance of the evidence
  • holding that a defendant must prove deficiency by a preponderance of the evidence
  • noting that “‘a motion for continuance, based on equitable grounds rather than statutory grounds, is entirely within the sound discretion of the court, and will only call for reversal if it is shown that the court clearly abused its discretion’”
  • “‘Failure to make the required showing of either deficient performance or sufficient prejudice defeats the ineffectiveness claim.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hinojosa, Chavez, Rodriguez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

96 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.