Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 5/25/2000
Munoz v. State
Citations
- 24 S.W.3d 427
- 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 3598
- 2000 WL 702394
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a defendant must prove deficiency by a preponderance of the evidence
- holding that a defendant must prove deficiency by a preponderance of the evidence
- noting that “‘a motion for continuance, based on equitable grounds rather than statutory grounds, is entirely within the sound discretion of the court, and will only call for reversal if it is shown that the court clearly abused its discretion’”
- “‘Failure to make the required showing of either deficient performance or sufficient prejudice defeats the ineffectiveness claim.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hinojosa, Chavez, Rodriguez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
96 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jaynes v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2006-11-22· cited 264×
- Blackshear, George EdwardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2012-12-19· cited 158×
- Woodall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2002-05-02· cited 67×
- Ricketts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2002-11-27· cited 59×
- Ponce v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2002-10-03· cited 51×
- Saldana v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2009-03-20· cited 48×
- Horner v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2004-04-08· cited 41×
- Resendez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2005-03-03· cited 41×
- Castillo v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2006-03-23· cited 18×
- Anderson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2008-08-14· cited 11×
- Lopez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2010-07-15· cited 6×
- Jesus Perez Saldana v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2008-02-21· cited 3×
- Rajendra Kumar Verma A/K/A Rajendra K. Verma v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2004-08-12
- Charles Dandreaun Seaton A/K/A Charles D. Seaton v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2005-02-03
- Darrell Lynn Edison v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2003-04-24
- Marcus Downie v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2001-11-29
- Raul Amaya Rios v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2002-11-27
- Roman Ponce v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2002-08-30
- Patsy Hunt v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2002-08-30
- Servando Cesar Castaneda v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2002-08-29
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Stafford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-07-03· cited 9,170×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-10-13· cited 6,146×
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-09-17· cited 3,060×
- Dewberry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-10-20· cited 2,718×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-06-01· cited 2,561×
- McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-02-21· cited 1,746×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-09-16· cited 452×
- Ex Parte AdamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-03-01· cited 295×
- Matamoros v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-06-14· cited 289×
- Montoya v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-06-19· cited 256×
- Hunnicutt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-01-14· cited 92×
- O'RARDEN v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1989-12-20· cited 78×
- Ex Parte DavisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-09-17· cited 69×
- Rangel v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1998-08-06· cited 61×
- Yates v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1996-02-29· cited 55×
- Petrick v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1992-06-18· cited 55×
- Rodriguez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1995-07-20· cited 54×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.