Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 907 S.W.2d 522
  • 1995 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 94
  • 1995 WL 552840

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a prospective juror with bias or prejudice against the parties in the case must be excused for cause
  • holding that a prospective juror who expresses an inability to be fair to the state is biased in favor of the defendant and is challengeable for cause
  • holding that a prospective juror who expresses an inability to be fair to the state is biased in favor of the defendant and is challengeable for cause
  • holding that a venire member who said he might give more credibility to a Texas Ranger’s testimony was allowed to serve as a juror
  • holding that \bias or prejudice in favor of or against the defendant\ in article 35.16(a)(9) includes bias for or against the State, as bias against one would constitute bias in favor of the other
  • holding that because appellant failed to apply the law to the facts of his case to demonstrate why he should prevail, his point of error was inadequately briefed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCormick, Clinton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

83 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.