Skip to main content

Green v. State

Citations

  • 840 S.W.2d 394
  • 1992 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 134
  • 1992 WL 116266

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that conflicting responses provided an adequate basis supporting the trial court’s decision to either retain a prospective juror or excuse the person for cause
  • holding that conflicting responses provided an adequate basis supporting the trial court’s decision to either retain a prospective juror or excuse the person for cause
  • holding that conflicting responses provided an adequate basis supporting the trial court's decision to either retain a prospective juror or excuse the person for cause
  • noting that case already had been reset once in concluding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion to withdraw counsel
  • holding admissible a close-up photograph of victim's head and shoulders where tubes and other medical equipment were visible
  • observing that “the right to counsel may not be manipulated so as to obstruct the judicial process or interfere with the administration of justice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clinton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

251 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.