Skip to main content
· 8/19/1986

Molever v. Roush

Citations

  • 732 P.2d 1105
  • 152 Ariz. 367
  • 1986 Ariz. App. LEXIS 695

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in legal malpractice case “the client’s recovery depends on a showing that ‘but for’ the alleged negligence of the attorney the injury complained of would not have occurred”
  • in legal malpractice case \the client's recovery depends on a showing that `but for' the alleged negligence of the attorney the injury complained of would not have occurred\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grant, Brooks, Froeb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.