· 8/19/1986
Molever v. Roush
Citations
- 732 P.2d 1105
- 152 Ariz. 367
- 1986 Ariz. App. LEXIS 695
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- in legal malpractice case “the client’s recovery depends on a showing that ‘but for’ the alleged negligence of the attorney the injury complained of would not have occurred”
- in legal malpractice case \the client's recovery depends on a showing that `but for' the alleged negligence of the attorney the injury complained of would not have occurred\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Grant, Brooks, Froeb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.