Wisener v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the plaintiff need not negate entirely the possibility that the defendant’s conduct was not a cause
• stating that plaintiff need not negate entirely the possibility that defendant’s conduct was not a cause
• litigants entitled to a “trial when there is the slightest doubt as to the essential facts”
• “Circumstantial evidence, expert testimony, or 9 common knowledge may provide a basis from which the causal sequence may be inferred. 10 Such questions are peculiarly for the jury, (and) are questions on which a court can seldom 11 rule as a matter of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).