Court of Appeals of Arizona· 8/21/1984
Schroeder v. Hudgins
Citations
- 690 P.2d 114
- 142 Ariz. 395
- 1984 Ariz. App. LEXIS 495
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- assignment of legal malpractice claims barred, citing “uniquely personal” relationship between attorney and client
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brooks, Eubank, Schmidt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Vinson & Elkins v. MoranTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1997-06-12· cited 188×
- Standard Chartered PLC v. Price WaterhouseCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-01-13· cited 130×
- Zuniga v. Groce, Locke & HebdonTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1994-05-31· cited 110×
- Picadilly, Inc. v. RaikosIndiana Supreme Court· 1991-12-02· cited 102×
- Earth Science Laboratories, Inc. v. Adkins & Wondra, P.C.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1994-11-04· cited 101×
- Roberts v. Holland & HartColorado Court of Appeals· 1993-01-28· cited 65×
- Kiley v. Jennings, Strouss & SalmonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-04-23· cited 49×
- MNC Credit Corp. v. SickelsSupreme Court of Virginia· 1998-02-27· cited 41×
- Jackson v. Rogers & WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1989-05-10· cited 40×
- Elliott v. VideanCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-06-05· cited 38×
- New Hampshire Insurance v. McCannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1999-03-10· cited 38×
- Blum v. STATE, DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-04-16· cited 35×
- Gurski v. Rosenblum and Filan, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-11-22· cited 35×
- Scarlett v. BarnesW.D. Missouri· 1990-11-26· cited 35×
- Can Do, Inc. Pension & Profit Sharing Plan & Successor Plans v. Manier, Herod, Hollabaugh & SmithTennessee Supreme Court· 1996-05-06· cited 34×
- Angus Medical Co. v. Digital Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-03-31· cited 33×
- Mallios v. BakerTexas Supreme Court· 2000-01-06· cited 33×
- Cecala v. NewmanD. Arizona· 2007-05-02· cited 33×
- Charles v. TamezTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1994-05-26· cited 32×
- Albers v. Edelson Technology Partners L.P.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-09-04· cited 31×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Goodley v. Wank & Wank, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1976-09-28· cited 151×
- Nicoletti v. Westcor, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court· 1982-01-11· cited 81×
- Christison v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois· 1980-04-29· cited 78×
- Cullison v. City of PeoriaArizona Supreme Court· 1978-09-15· cited 71×
- Green v. Victor Talking MacH. Co.Second Circuit· 1928-02-06· cited 67×
- Arnold v. PhillipsFifth Circuit· 1941-02-04· cited 52×
- Portonova v. WilkinsonArizona Supreme Court· 1981-04-08· cited 45×
- WJ Kroeger Co. v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyArizona Supreme Court· 1975-10-03· cited 42×
- Cote v. A. J. Bayless Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-01-15· cited 35×
- Long v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-04-02· cited 33×
- Arctic Contractors, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1978-02-03· cited 24×
- Funk v. SpaldingArizona Supreme Court· 1952-07-15· cited 22×
- Chalpin v. BrennanCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-11-26· cited 18×
- Employers Casualty Co. v. MooreArizona Supreme Court· 1943-10-18· cited 18×
- Hidalgo v. McCauleyArizona Supreme Court· 1937-07-12· cited 17×
- Dykes v. Clem Lumber Co.Arizona Supreme Court· 1941-11-03· cited 17×
- Schmidt v. MEL CLAYTON FORD, ETC.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-06-28· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.