Skip to main content
· 12/24/1996

Collins v. Miller & Miller, Ltd.

Citations

  • 943 P.2d 747
  • 189 Ariz. 387
  • 232 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 37
  • 1996 Ariz. App. LEXIS 271

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Collateral estoppel precludes relitigation of issues that are ... identical to those issues already litigated by the parties ....”
  • breach of contract claim requires specificity beyond “a general promise . . . to provide reasonably competent [] services.”
  • in establishing causation in a legal malpractice action, the plaintiff must convince the trier of fact that, but for attorney’s negligence, a reasonable judge or jury would have decided in his or her favor in underlying action
  • in establishing causation in a legal malpractice action, the plaintiff must 38 1-12-3122 convince the trier of fact that, but for attorney's negligence, a reasonable judge or jury would have decided in his or her favor in underlying action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sult, Voss, Ehrlich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.