Helmbrecht v. St. Paul Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that \the question of what a reasonable judge would have awarded as property division and maintenance is no more complicated than other issues decided by juries every day all across this nation\
• any-credible-evidence standard of § 805.14(1), Stats., applies to both the trial court on postverdict motions and to supreme court on appeal
• divorce settlement could be attacked in malpractice action, even where judge testified that he would not have awarded more had the error not been made
• \We hold that there was substantiated credible evidence to support the jury's -finding of malpractice. The trial court was clearly wrong in granting the defendants' motion to dismiss after the verdict was returned\
• “[Tjhere was the danger that the jury would give his testimony undue weight.”
• \[T]here was the danger that the jury would give his testimony undue weight.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).