· 5/30/1984
Stratton v. Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co.
Citations
- 683 P.2d 327
- 140 Ariz. 528
- 1984 Ariz. App. LEXIS 396
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that absent privity of contract, party has no claim for personal judgment sounding in breach of contract
- “[T]he doctrine of unjust enrichment has no application to the owner where an explicit contract exists between the [plaintiff] and the prime contractor.”
- “Since there was no privity of 10 contract between appellant and [defendant], appellant has no claim for a personal 11 judgment sounding in breach of contract.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howard, Birdsall, Hathaway
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.