Skip to main content
· 5/30/1984

Stratton v. Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co.

Citations

  • 683 P.2d 327
  • 140 Ariz. 528
  • 1984 Ariz. App. LEXIS 396

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that absent privity of contract, party has no claim for personal judgment sounding in breach of contract
  • “[T]he doctrine of unjust enrichment has no application to the owner where an explicit contract exists between the [plaintiff] and the prime contractor.”
  • “Since there was no privity of 10 contract between appellant and [defendant], appellant has no claim for a personal 11 judgment sounding in breach of contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard, Birdsall, Hathaway

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.