Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Arizona Supreme Court· 9/5/1985

Markowitz v. Arizona Parks Board

Citations

  • 706 P.2d 364
  • 146 Ariz. 352
  • 1985 Ariz. LEXIS 247

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the State owed a duty to plaintiff because it “invited and indeed encouraged [plaintiff] and others to come to a parcel of land specifically dedicated to extensive public use and enjoyment”
  • noting that \the existence of a duty is not to be confused with details of the standard of conduct\
  • noting that “the existence of a duty is not to be confused with details of the standard of conduct”
  • noting that a question of breach of duty is a fact question properly submitted to a jury
  • explaining that the concept of duty should not be confused with the specific details of conduct
  • explaining that the concept of duty should not be confused with the specific details of conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feldman, Holohan, Gordon, Hays, Cameron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

150 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Markowitz v. Arizona Parks Board

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.